2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(30번) [모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어]

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(30번)와 정답자료가 필요하시다고요?

 

걱정 마세요! 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어가 해결해 드립니다!

 

 

 

 

3등급도 전교 1등으로! (서울  영일고, 송도 박문여고)

3등급도 전교 2등으로! (서울  목동고)

5등급도 1등급으로! (서울  진명여고)

3등급도 1등급으로! (서울 마포고, 서울 신도림고)

 

모두가 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어와 함께 한 결과입니다.

 

 

 

 

 

 

목동 현대파리지앙 409호 미키박영어 (010 6693 6636)

 

 

오늘은 2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(30번)와 정답자료를 제공해 드립니다.

 

모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어

 

 

 

좋은 내신 성적은 진심에서 나오는 거 아시죠?

 

30번 지문에 대한 완벽한 이해는 기본이죠?

 

 

미키박영어 2025년6월고1모의고사30번해설

 

 

30번 내용 확실히 익히셨으리라 믿고,

 

변형문제 도전 시작합니다!

 

 

 

 

Here we go!

 

 

 

 

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(30번) 

1. 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 어법상 틀린 것은?

 

It is natural for people to observe happenings and then seek explanations for why those happenings occurred, but sometimes the reasoning ①is wrong because of one or more misconceptions. One of these is the ecological fallacy, where an argument claims ②which there is a causal relationship between two things merely because they occur together. For example, in the 1950s it was found that crime rates were the highest in neighborhoods ③where immigrants were most numerous. Some people used this “co-occurrence” to argue that immigrants were a cause of crime. But a careful analysis of this situation revealed that immigrants ④were forced to live in neighborhoods where crime rates were already high; they could not afford more expensive housing in safer neighborhoods. Immigrants ⑤themselves committed very few of the crimes. Unless you analyze the claim carefully, you would misinterpret the relationship and thereby construct a faulty belief. 

 

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

②which - that 

-> 앞의 claim 이 '주장' 이라는 추상적 의미의 명사죠?

그래서, 추상적의미의 명사 + that + 완전문일 경우, 동격의 접속사 that 이라고 하죠?

해석은 '~라는' 이라고 하죠?

which + 불완전문입니다.

본문에서는 완전문( there is a causal relationship)이므로 that 이 옳습니다.

 

 

 

 

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(30번) 

2 다음 글의 주제로 가장 알맞은 것은?

 

It is natural for people to observe happenings and then seek explanations for why those happenings occurred, but sometimes the reasoning is wrong because of one or more misconceptions. One of these is the ecological fallacy, where an argument claims that there is a causal relationship between two things merely because they occur together. For example, in the 1950s it was found that crime rates were the highest in neighborhoods where immigrants were most numerous. Some people used this “co-occurrence” to argue that immigrants were a cause of crime. But a careful analysis of this situation revealed that immigrants were forced to live in neighborhoods where crime rates were already high; they could not afford more expensive housing in safer neighborhoods. Immigrants themselves committed very few of the crimes. Unless you analyze the claim carefully, you would misinterpret the relationship and thereby construct a faulty belief. 

① Immigrants committed very few crimes in the 1950s.
② High crime rates are mostly caused by neighborhood environments.
③ People naturally try to find reasons for what they observe.
④ Careful data analysis can help solve housing issues for immigrants.
⑤ Assuming a causal relationship based on co-occurrence can lead to incorrect conclusions.

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ⑤

🧠 해설
이 글은 "ecological fallacy(생태학적 오류)"라는 개념을 설명하며, **“단순히 두 현상이 함께 나타난다는 이유로 인과관계를 추정하는 것은 잘못된 결론으로 이어질 수 있다”**는 주제를 전달하고 있습니다.

핵심 문장은 다음과 같습니다:

“One of these is the ecological fallacy, where an argument claims that there is a causal relationship between two things merely because they occur together.”
“Unless you analyze the claim carefully, you would misinterpret the relationship and thereby construct a faulty belief.”

즉, **공동 발생(co-occurrence)**이 **인과 관계(causation)**를 의미하지는 않는다는 것입니다.

🔍 보기 해석 (한국어)
① 1950년대 이민자들은 범죄를 거의 저지르지 않았다.
→ 글 속의 예시는 사실이나, 주제는 아님 ❌

② 높은 범죄율은 주로 지역 환경에 의해 발생한다.
→ 지역적 요인이 원인이라는 주장 아님 ❌

③ 사람들은 관찰한 것에 대한 이유를 찾으려는 경향이 있다.
→ 서두에서 언급되긴 했지만, 글 전체의 중심은 아님 ❌

④ 정확한 데이터 분석은 이민자의 주거 문제 해결에 도움이 될 수 있다.
→ 주거 문제 해결은 본문의 주제가 아님 ❌

⑤ 함께 나타난다고 해서 인과관계가 있다고 가정하는 것은 잘못된 결론을 초래할 수 있다.
→ 생태학적 오류(ecological fallacy)의 정의이자 글의 주제 ✅

 

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(30번) 

3. 다음 문장에 이어질 글의 순서를 정하시오.

 

It is natural for people to observe happenings and then seek explanations for why those happenings occurred, but sometimes the reasoning is wrong because of one or more misconceptions. 

(A) Immigrants themselves committed very few of the crimes. Unless you analyze the claim carefully, you would misinterpret the relationship and thereby construct a faulty belief. 
(B) One of these is the ecological fallacy, where an argument claims that there is a causal relationship between two things merely because they occur together. For example, in the 1950s it was found that crime rates were the highest in neighborhoods where immigrants were most numerous. Some people used this “co-occurrence” to argue that immigrants were a cause of crime. 
(C) But a careful analysis of this situation revealed that immigrants were forced to live in neighborhoods where crime rates were already high; they could not afford more expensive housing in safer neighborhoods.
① (A) - (C) - (B)
② (B) - (A) - (C)
③ (B) - (C) - (A)
④ (C) - (A) - (B)
⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답
③ (B) - (C) - (A)

✅ 정답에 대한 이유
**(B)**는 ‘생태학적 오류’라는 개념 정의와 구체적 예시를 제시하여 글의 주제를 본격적으로 도입합니다.
**(C)**는 앞서 제시된 오해를 반박하며, 범죄율과 이주민 분포의 상관관계가 구조적 요인(주거 비용) 때문임을 설명해 논거를 강화합니다.
**(A)**는 이주민이 실제로 저지른 범죄는 적었고, 분석이 부실하면 잘못된 결론에 도달한다는 경고로 글을 마무리합니다.

따라서 **(B → C → A)**가 ‘개념 및 사례 제시 → 원인 분석 → 교훈·결론’이라는 논리적 흐름을 이루어 가장 자연스럽습니다.

 

 

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(30번) 

 

4. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 가장 알맞은 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

It is natural for people to observe happenings and then seek explanations for why those happenings occurred, but sometimes the reasoning is wrong because of one or more misconceptions. One of these is the ecological fallacy, where an argument claims that there is a causal relationship between two things merely because they occur together. For example, in the 1950s it was found that crime rates were the highest in neighborhoods where immigrants were most numerous. Some people used this “co-occurrence” to argue that immigrants were a cause of crime. But a careful analysis of this situation revealed that immigrants were forced to live in neighborhoods where crime rates were already high; they could not afford more expensive housing in safer neighborhoods. Immigrants themselves committed very few of the crimes. Unless you analyze the claim carefully, you would misinterpret the relationship and thereby _______________.
① reinforce a valid interpretation with statistical backing
② construct a faulty belief based on a mistaken link
③ prove that correlation always means causation
④ demonstrate how immigrants reduce crime rates
⑤ accept all co-occurring events as accidental

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

정답: ②

해설:
빈칸 앞 문장에서 “Unless you analyze the claim carefully”라고 조건절이 주어지며, 분석을 제대로 하지 않으면 어떤 결과가 되는지를 묻는 문맥입니다. 문맥상으로 볼 때, '이민자가 범죄의 원인'이라는 잘못된 결론에 도달하는 것이 핵심 오류이며, 이는 "construct a faulty belief based on a mistaken link" (잘못된 연결에 기반하여 잘못된 믿음을 만든다)는 표현이 가장 정확하게 설명합니다.

① valid interpretation: 문맥상 틀린 해석임

③ correlation → causation: 너무 직접적이고 문맥 왜곡

④ immigrants reduce crime: 본문의 주장 아님

⑤ accidental: 인과관계를 착각하는 것이므로 문맥과 맞지 않음

 

 

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(30번) 

5. 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

 

It is natural for people to observe happenings and then seek explanations for why those happenings occurred, but sometimes the reasoning is wrong because of one or more misconceptions. One of these is the ecological fallacy, where an argument claims that there is a causal relationship between two things merely because they occur together. For example, in the 1950s it was found that crime rates were the highest in neighborhoods where immigrants were most numerous. Some people used this “co-occurrence” to argue that immigrants were a cause of crime. But a careful analysis of this situation revealed that immigrants were forced to live in neighborhoods where crime rates were already high; they could not afford more expensive housing in safer neighborhoods. Immigrants themselves committed very few of the crimes. Unless you analyze the claim carefully, you would misinterpret the relationship and thereby construct a faulty belief. 

↓

The ecological fallacy refers to the mistaken assumption that a (A)_________________ between two observed factors implies a (B)_____________ connection between them. 
            (A)                  (B)
① co-occurrence / causal  
② misunderstanding / regional
③ situation / harmful
④ correlation / statistical
⑤ assumption / visible

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ① co-occurrence / causal

🔍 해설
(A) co-occurrence: 본문에서 “they occur together”는 ‘동시 발생(공동 발생)’을 의미합니다.

(B) causal: 본문의 핵심 오류는 "co-occurrence"를 causal relationship으로 오해하는 것이라고 명시되어 있습니다.

❌ 오답 해설
보기 어휘 조합 오답 이유
② misunderstanding / regional "regional"은 본문 내용과 관련 없음
③ situation / harmful 부정확하고 내용과 거리 있음
④ correlation / statistical correlation은 약간 근접하나, "causal"이라는 명확한 논리적 연결성이 중요
⑤ assumption / visible "visible"은 관계의 본질을 설명하지 못함

 

 

 

 

 

지금까지 모의고사변형문제월드 목동 미키박영어의

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(30번)와 정답자료였습니다.

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(31번)와 정답자료도 확인해보실까요?

 

 

 

이 외에도

구글, 다음, 네이버, 유튜브에서 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어라고 검색하시면

정말 많은 모의고사 변형문제 자료들을 무료로 활용하실 수 있습니다.

 

 

그리고, 영문법에 대한 유용한 자료는

재미짐영어 미키박쌤을 확인해보세요.

 

감사합니다.