2025년6월고3모의고사변형문제(32번) [모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어]

2025년6월고3모의고사변형문제(32번)와 정답자료가 필요하시다고요?

 

걱정 마세요! 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어가 해결해 드립니다!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3등급도 전교 1등으로! (서울  영일고, 송도 박문여고)

3등급도 전교 2등으로! (서울  목동고)

5등급도 1등급으로! (서울  진명여고)

3등급도 1등급으로! (서울 마포고, 서울 신도림고)

 

모두가 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어와 함께 한 결과입니다.

 

 

 

 

 

목동 현대파리지앙 409호 미키박영어 (010 6693 6636)

 

 

오늘은 2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(32번)와 정답자료를 제공해 드립니다.

 

 

모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어

 

 

좋은 내신 성적은 진심에서 나오는 거 아시죠?

 

32번 지문에 대한 완벽한 이해는 기본이죠?

 

 

미키박영어 2025년6월고3모의고사32번해설

 

 

32번 내용 확실히 익히셨으리라 믿고,

 

변형문제 도전 시작합니다!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here we go!

 

 

 

 

 

2025년6월고3모의고사변형문제(32번) 

1. 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 어법상 틀린 것은?

 

Writers often give us the impression that they have described the faces of their characters, when in fact they have simply given you an outline ①to fill in. Of Esch, the most important character in Hermann Broch’s masterpiece The Sleepwalkers, we learn only ②that he has big teeth. Even so, we don’t feel as if his face is a dentate blankness. Most often, we mistake ③telling what effect someone’s appearance has for an account of that appearance. The poet Mallarmé’s advice ― Peindre non la chose, mais l’effet qu’elle produit (‘Paint not the thing itself but the effect it produces’) sounds like a ④self-denying ordinance. Actually it is a rather clever way out of an intractable problem. When, in one of his novels, Evelyn Waugh says of a new character, that ‘he had just the kind of appearance one would expect a young man of his type to have’ and nothing else, you still feel as if you ⑤have been told exactly what he looks like. 
* dentate: 이가 있는 ** ordinance: 법령
*** intractable: 다루기 힘든

 

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

③telling -> being told

be told 는 '듣다' 라는 의미죠?

본문에서 우리가 '듣는' 의미이므로 be told 의 형태가 옳습니다.

 

being pp 마스터하면 영어실력 UP!

 

 

 

 

2025년6월고3모의고사변형문제(32번) 

2 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 문맥상 어색한 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

Writers often give us the impression that they have described the faces of their characters, when in fact they have simply given you an ①outline to fill in. Of Esch, the most important character in Hermann Broch’s masterpiece The Sleepwalkers, we learn only that he has big teeth. Even so, we don’t feel as if his face is a dentate blankness. Most often, we ②mistake being told what effect someone’s appearance has for an account of that appearance. The poet Mallarmé’s advice ― Peindre non la chose, mais l’effet qu’elle produit (‘Paint not the thing itself but the effect it produces’) sounds like a self-denying ③ordinance. Actually it is a rather clever way out of an ④intractable problem. When, in one of his novels, Evelyn Waugh says of a new character, that ‘he had just the kind of appearance one would expect a young man of his type to have’ and nothing else, you still feel as if you have been told ⑤exactly what he looks like. 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

→ 정답: ④ intractable

📘 정답 해설
④ intractable (고집 센, 완고한, 다루기 힘든) → 원문 단어: 동일하지만 문맥상 어색함

문장에서 말하는 문제는, 작가가 외형을 구체적으로 묘사하지 않아도 독자는 어떤 인상을 형성하게 된다는 사실에서 발생하는 표현의 역설입니다.
즉, “작가가 외형을 구체적으로 그리지 않으면서도 이미지가 만들어지는 현상”이라는 문학적·표현상의 문제이지, 고집스럽거나 해결 불가능한 현실적 문제는 아닙니다.

intractable는 보통 정치적 갈등, 난치병, 사회적 문제 등 현실 세계에서 다루기 어려운 문제에 쓰이는 단어이며,
예술적 선택이나 문학적 고민을 설명하는 문맥에서는 지나치게 강하고 기계적인 어휘로, 부자연스럽습니다.

✅ 더 적절한 대체어:

subtle (미묘한 문제)

persistent (지속되는 문제)

paradoxical (역설적인 문제)

elusive (파악하기 어려운 문제)

📙 다른 보기 해설
① outline → 원문 단어 동일
👉 작가가 얼굴을 묘사하기보다 개략적인 틀만 제공한다는 비유에 적절한 표현입니다.

② mistake → 원문 단어 동일
👉 효과에 대한 설명을 묘사로 오해한다는 현상을 설명하는 데 적절한 동사입니다.

③ ordinance → 원문 단어 동일
👉 Mallarmé의 문장은 예술적 선언이나 제약으로 비유되며, 여기서 ‘ordinance(자기부과 규율)’라는 표현은 문맥상 매우 적절합니다.

⑤ exactly → 원문 단어 동일
👉 외형에 대해 거의 설명하지 않았음에도 불구하고 ‘정확히 본 것 같은 느낌’을 설명하는 데 딱 맞는 부사입니다.

 

 

 

2025년6월고3모의고사변형문제(32번) 

3. 다음 문장에 이어질 글의 순서를 정하시오.

 

Writers often give us the impression that they have described the faces of their characters, when in fact they have simply given you an outline to fill in. Of Esch, the most important character in Hermann Broch’s masterpiece The Sleepwalkers, we learn only that he has big teeth.  

(A)
The poet Mallarmé’s advice ― Peindre non la chose, mais l’effet qu’elle produit (‘Paint not the thing itself but the effect it produces’) sounds like a self-denying ordinance. Actually it is a rather clever way out of an intractable problem. 
(B)
Even so, we don’t feel as if his face is a dentate blankness. Most often, we mistake being told what effect someone’s appearance has for an account of that appearance. 
(C)
When, in one of his novels, Evelyn Waugh says of a new character, that ‘he had just the kind of appearance one would expect a young man of his type to have’ and nothing else, you still feel as if you have been told exactly what he looks like. 
① (A) - (C) - (B)
② (B) - (A) - (C)
③ (B) - (C) - (A)
④ (C) - (A) - (B)
⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ③ (B) - (C) - (A)

📝 해설:
제시문은 인물 묘사에서 실제 외모보다 인상이 더 강조되는 방식을 설명합니다.

(B)는 Esch의 묘사가 모호해도 인상이 생생하다는 연결된 설명입니다.

(C)는 유사한 사례로 Evelyn Waugh의 소설 예시를 제시합니다.

(A)는 이런 문학적 기법을 이론적으로 정리하는 Mallarmé의 조언을 언급하며 전체 내용을 철학적으로 마무리합니다.

 

 

 

2025년6월고3모의고사변형문제(32번) 

 

4. 다음 글의 주제로 가장 알맞은 것은?

 

Writers often give us the impression that they have described the faces of their characters, when in fact they have simply given you an outline to fill in. Of Esch, the most important character in Hermann Broch’s masterpiece The Sleepwalkers, we learn only that he has big teeth. Even so, we don’t feel as if his face is a dentate blankness. Most often, we mistake being told what effect someone’s appearance has for an account of that appearance. The poet Mallarmé’s advice ― Peindre non la chose, mais l’effet qu’elle produit (‘Paint not the thing itself but the effect it produces’) sounds like a self-denying ordinance. Actually it is a rather clever way out of an intractable problem. When, in one of his novels, Evelyn Waugh says of a new character, that ‘he had just the kind of appearance one would expect a young man of his type to have’ and nothing else, you still feel as if you have been told exactly what he looks like. 
① 작가들은 항상 등장인물의 외모를 상세히 묘사해야 한다.
② 사람들의 외모에 대한 묘사는 종종 실제보다 과장되어 있다.
③ 추상적인 묘사는 등장인물의 감정 표현에 효과적이다.
④ 외모를 직접 묘사하지 않고도 인상을 통해 생생히 전달할 수 있다.
⑤ 인물 묘사는 작품의 배경 설정보다 덜 중요하다.

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답
④ 외모를 직접 묘사하지 않고도 인상을 통해 생생히 전달할 수 있다.

📝 해설
이 글의 핵심은 작가들이 외모를 직접적으로 설명하지 않아도, 그 인물에 대한 생생한 인상을 독자가 충분히 느낄 수 있다는 점입니다.

예시 1: Hermann Broch의 소설에서 이가 크다는 한 문장만으로도 인물이 생생하게 느껴짐.

예시 2: Evelyn Waugh는 외모를 거의 설명하지 않지만, 독자는 “그럴 법한 인상”만으로도 생생한 이미지를 떠올림.

Mallarmé의 말도 소개되죠: "사물 자체가 아니라 그것이 주는 효과를 그려라."

이러한 설명은 직접적 외모 묘사 없이도 인물을 효과적으로 전달하는 기법에 관한 것입니다.

보기 분석
① 작가들은 항상 등장인물의 외모를 상세히 묘사해야 한다. ❌
→ 실제로는 그 반대를 설명하는 글입니다.

② 사람들의 외모에 대한 묘사는 종종 실제보다 과장되어 있다. ❌
→ 과장에 대한 이야기는 나오지 않습니다.

③ 추상적인 묘사는 등장인물의 감정 표현에 효과적이다. ❌
→ 감정이 아니라 외모 인상에 관한 설명입니다.

④ 외모를 직접 묘사하지 않고도 인상을 통해 생생히 전달할 수 있다. ✅
→ 글 전체의 요지를 정확히 담고 있습니다.

⑤ 인물 묘사는 작품의 배경 설정보다 덜 중요하다. ❌
→ 배경 설정과의 비교는 등장하지 않습니다.

 

 

 

2025년6월고3모의고사변형문제(32번) 

5. 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

 

Writers often give us the impression that they have described the faces of their characters, when in fact they have simply given you an outline to fill in. Of Esch, the most important character in Hermann Broch’s masterpiece The Sleepwalkers, we learn only that he has big teeth. Even so, we don’t feel as if his face is a dentate blankness. Most often, we mistake being told what effect someone’s appearance has for an account of that appearance. The poet Mallarmé’s advice — Peindre non la chose, mais l’effet qu’elle produit (‘Paint not the thing itself but the effect it produces’) — sounds like a self-denying ordinance. Actually it is a rather clever way out of an intractable problem. When, in one of his novels, Evelyn Waugh says of a new character that “he had just the kind of appearance one would expect a young man of his type to have” and nothing else, you still feel as if you have been told exactly what he looks like. 

↓

Writers often describe not (A) but (B), which allows readers to vividly imagine characters without detailed visual descriptions. 
            (A)                           (B)
① appearance               impression
② identity                       personality
③ background               lifestyle
④ emotion                     attitude
⑤ character                  motivation

 

정답은?

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ① appearance ··· impression

✨ 해설:
(A) appearance (외모)
→ 글에서는 작가들이 인물의 얼굴을 묘사한 듯하지만 실제로는 외모를 구체적으로 설명하지 않는 경우가 많다고 말합니다. 대신, 어떤 인상을 주는지를 묘사하는 방식으로 처리하는 경우가 많다고 하죠.

(B) impression (인상)
→ 대표적으로 *“Paint not the thing itself but the effect it produces”*라는 Mallarmé의 말이 강조됩니다. 즉, 대상을 직접 묘사하지 않고 그것이 주는 효과나 인상만을 전달하는 것이죠.
Evelyn Waugh의 예시에서도 구체적인 묘사가 없어도 인상만으로 충분히 생생한 이미지가 전달됨을 설명합니다.

❌ 오답 설명:
② identity / personality: 신원과 성격에 관한 설명은 아님. 시각적인 인상에 관한 문제입니다.

③ background / lifestyle: 배경이나 생활방식은 언급되지 않음.

④ emotion / attitude: 감정과 태도보다는 외적 인상에 관한 글입니다.

⑤ character / motivation: 등장인물의 성격이나 동기보다는 외형적 인상에 관한 내용입니다.

 

 

 

 

지금까지 모의고사변형문제월드 목동 미키박영어의

2025년6월고3모의고사변형문제(32번)와 정답자료였습니다.

 

2025년6월고3모의고사변형문제(33번)와 정답자료도 확인해보실까요?

 

 

 

이 외에도

구글, 다음, 네이버, 유튜브에서 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어라고 검색하시면

정말 많은 모의고사 변형문제 자료들을 무료로 활용하실 수 있습니다.

 

 

그리고, 영문법에 대한 유용한 자료는

재미짐영어 미키박쌤을 확인해보세요.

 

감사합니다.