2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(36번) [모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어]

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(36번)와 정답자료가 필요하시다고요?

 

걱정 마세요! 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어가 해결해 드립니다!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3등급도 전교 1등으로! (서울  영일고, 송도 박문여고)

3등급도 전교 2등으로! (서울  목동고)

5등급도 1등급으로! (서울  진명여고)

3등급도 1등급으로! (서울 마포고, 서울 신도림고)

 

모두가 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어와 함께 한 결과입니다.

 

 

 

 

 

목동 현대파리지앙 409호 미키박영어 (010 6693 6636)

 

 

오늘은 2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(36번)와 정답자료를 제공해 드립니다.

 

 

모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어

 

 

좋은 내신 성적은 진심에서 나오는 거 아시죠?

 

36번 지문에 대한 완벽한 이해는 기본이죠?

 

 

미키박영어 2025년6월고1모의고사36번해설

 

 

36번 내용 확실히 익히셨으리라 믿고,

 

변형문제 도전 시작합니다!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here we go!

 

 

 

 

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(36번) 

1. 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 어법상 틀린 것은?

 

History, people often say, repeats itself. And ①looking at the historical records of the ancient civilizations, some things do seem to happen again and again. Civilizations expand, get overextended, and then collapse, as in the cases of Rome, ②it went under in 476 AD, and the British Empire, which fell apart more than a thousand years later in the post–World War II era. But is this always the case? If so, archaeology would be pretty ③boring; one thing would happen again and again. But that’s not what archaeologists see. Some civilizations end suddenly, like the Aztec and Inca, ④conquered by invaders in the 1520s AD. Those empires never had the chance ⑤to collapse as a result of overexpansion. So in the case of civilizations, “history repeats itself” seems to be an oversimplification. 

 

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

②it -> which

-> ② 번을 중심으로 절과 절이 연결된 상태죠?

Civilizations expand, get overextended, and then collapse, as in the cases of Rome, ②it went under in 476 AD

앞에 동사로 병렬된 부분이 보입니다. 절 1 : expand, get~,  and then collapse + 절 2 : ②it went under in 476 AD

절과 절이 연결되었으니 ②번의 자리는 연결사 자리죠?

따라서, Rome 을 가리키면서 연결을 하는 기능을 하는 관계대명사 which 가 옳습니다.

it 은 연결 기능이 없는 대명사입니다.

 

연결사

 

 

 

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(36번) 

2 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 문맥상 어색한 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

History, people often say, repeats itself. And looking at the historical records of the ancient civilizations, some things do seem to ① recur again and again. Civilizations expand, get ② overgrown, and then collapse, as in the cases of Rome, which went under in 476 AD, and the British Empire, which fell apart more than a thousand years later in the post–World War II era. But is this always the case? If so, archaeology would be pretty ③ dull; one thing would happen again and again. But that’s not what archaeologists see. Some civilizations end suddenly, like the Aztec and Inca, ④ invaded by invaders in the 1520s AD. Those empires never had the chance to ⑤ weaken as a result of overexpansion.

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ⑤ weaken

📌 해설
① recur ← 원문 happen again: ‘되풀이되다’의 뜻으로 적절함.

② overgrown ← 원문 overextended: ‘지나치게 커진’의 뉘앙스로 유사하게 표현됨.

③ dull ← 원문 boring: ‘지루한’이라는 의미에서 적절한 대체어.

④ invaded ← 원문 conquered: ‘침입당한’으로 문맥상 자연스러움.

⑤ weaken ❌ 원문 collapse를 대체할 수 없음.

collapse는 ‘완전히 무너짐’을 뜻하고,

weaken은 ‘점점 약해지다’로, 갑작스러운 멸망을 표현하기에 부적절합니다.

 

 

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(36번) 

3. 다음 글의 주제로 가장 알맞은 것은?

 

History, people often say, repeats itself. And looking at the historical records of the ancient civilizations, some things do seem to happen again and again. Civilizations expand, get overextended, and then collapse, as in the cases of Rome, which went under in 476 AD, and the British Empire, which fell apart more than a thousand years later in the post–World War II era. But is this always the case? If so, archaeology would be pretty boring; one thing would happen again and again. But that’s not what archaeologists see. Some civilizations end suddenly, like the Aztec and Inca, conquered by invaders in the 1520s AD. Those empires never had the chance to collapse as a result of overexpansion. So in the case of civilizations, “history repeats itself” seems to be an oversimplification. 

① All great empires eventually collapse due to overexpansion.
② The fall of the British Empire mirrors that of ancient Rome.
③ The idea that history always repeats itself oversimplifies historical reality.
④ Archaeologists find studying ancient civilizations boring due to repetition.
⑤ Invasions were the only cause of ancient civilizations’ downfall.

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ③

🧠 해설
이 글의 핵심은 다음과 같습니다:

사람들이 흔히 “역사는 반복된다”고 말하지만, 모든 문명이 똑같은 방식으로 흥망성쇠를 겪는 것은 아니다.

어떤 문명은 과도한 팽창 끝에 무너졌지만 (예: 로마, 대영제국),

어떤 문명은 갑작스러운 외부 침입으로 멸망했다 (예: 아즈텍, 잉카).

따라서 “역사는 반복된다”는 말은 역사적 복잡성을 지나치게 단순화한 표현이다.

→ 이 중심 주장과 정확히 일치하는 선택지는 ③번입니다.

🔍 보기 해석 
① 모든 위대한 제국은 결국 과도한 팽창으로 인해 붕괴된다. ❌
→ 일부 제국에만 해당하며, 지문은 이를 일반화하는 것이 부정확하다고 설명함.

② 대영제국의 몰락은 고대 로마의 몰락을 반영한다. ❌
→ 언급되긴 하지만 지문의 핵심 주장은 아님.

③ 역사가 항상 반복된다는 생각은 역사적 현실을 지나치게 단순화한 것이다. ✅
→ 지문의 주제와 정확히 일치함.

④ 고고학자들은 반복되는 내용 때문에 고대 문명 연구를 지루해 한다. ❌
→ 오히려 지문은 고고학이 흥미로운 이유는 다양성이 있기 때문이라고 설명함.

⑤ 고대 문명이 몰락한 유일한 원인은 침략이다. ❌
→ 과도한 팽창도 한 원인으로 제시됨.

 

 

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(36번) 

 

4. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 가장 알맞은 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

History, people often say, repeats itself. And looking at the historical records of the ancient civilizations, some things do seem to happen again and again. Civilizations expand, get overextended, and then collapse, as in the cases of Rome, which went under in 476 AD, and the British Empire, which fell apart more than a thousand years later in the post–World War II era. But is this always the case? If so, archaeology would be pretty boring; one thing would happen again and again. But that’s not what archaeologists see. Some civilizations end suddenly, like the Aztec and Inca, conquered by invaders in the 1520s AD. Those empires never had the chance to collapse as a result of overexpansion. So in the case of civilizations, “history repeats itself” seems to be an oversimplification, __________________.
① because history books are often biased in recording ancient failures
② as many empires actually decline due to internal political unrest
③ since historical cycles tend to follow predictable economic patterns
④ given that the reasons for the fall of civilizations vary greatly
⑤ although such a pattern is proven in every major archaeological site

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

정답: ④

해설:
이 글의 마지막 문장은 **“‘역사는 반복된다’는 말은 지나치게 단순화된 것”**이라고 주장하고 있습니다. 그 이유는 다양한 문명이 서로 다른 방식으로 몰락했기 때문입니다.

④번 **“given that the reasons for the fall of civilizations vary greatly(문명이 몰락하는 이유가 매우 다양하다는 점을 고려하면)”**은 이 핵심 주제를 정확히 뒷받침합니다.

①, ②, ③번은 각각 편향, 정치적 불안, 경제적 패턴에 초점을 맞추지만, 지문에서 강조하는 다양성을 포괄하지 못합니다.

⑤번은 모든 고고학 유적에서 동일한 패턴이 나타난다고 주장하는데, 이는 글의 핵심 주장과 정반대입니다.

 

 

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(36번) 

5. 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

 

History, people often say, repeats itself. And looking at the historical records of the ancient civilizations, some things do seem to happen again and again. Civilizations expand, get overextended, and then collapse, as in the cases of Rome, which went under in 476 AD, and the British Empire, which fell apart more than a thousand years later in the post–World War II era. But is this always the case? If so, archaeology would be pretty boring; one thing would happen again and again. But that’s not what archaeologists see. Some civilizations end suddenly, like the Aztec and Inca, conquered by invaders in the 1520s AD. Those empires never had the chance to collapse as a result of overexpansion. So in the case of civilizations, “history repeats itself” seems to be an oversimplification. 

↓

The idea that history (A)____________ itself is sometimes true in the case of civilizations, but it is ultimately an (B)___________ that fails to capture their diverse fates.
       (A)                (B)
① repeats / oversimplification 
② rewrites / explanation
③ repeats / interpretation
④ remembers / assumption
⑤ forgets / generalization

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ① repeats / oversimplification

🔍 해설
(A) repeats: 지문에서 "History, people often say, repeats itself."라고 명시되어 있음. 역사 속 문명의 흥망성쇠가 반복된다고 흔히 말함.

(B) oversimplification: 하지만 모든 문명이 같은 방식으로 흥하고 망한 것은 아니므로, 역사 반복이라는 주장은 지나치게 단순화된 해석(oversimplification)이라는 것이 글의 핵심임.

❌ 오답 해설
② rewrites / explanation '역사가 스스로를 다시 쓰다(rewrites)'는 표현은 문맥상 어색하며, 'explanation(설명)'은 본문의 주장과 맞지 않음
③ repeats / interpretation 'interpretation'은 다소 모호하고, 단순화(overgeneralization)에 대한 비판이 본문의 핵심이므로 부적절
④ remembers / assumption '역사가 기억한다(remembers)'는 비유적 표현이지만 본문 흐름과 맞지 않음
⑤ forgets / generalization 역사 자체가 '잊는다'는 표현은 지문과 무관하며, 'generalization'은 oversimplification보다 약한 표현임

 

 

 

 

 

지금까지 모의고사변형문제월드 목동 미키박영어의

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(36번)와 정답자료였습니다.

 

2025년6월고1모의고사변형문제(37번)와 정답자료도 확인해보실까요?

 

 

 

이 외에도

구글, 다음, 네이버, 유튜브에서 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어라고 검색하시면

정말 많은 모의고사 변형문제 자료들을 무료로 활용하실 수 있습니다.

 

 

그리고, 영문법에 대한 유용한 자료는

재미짐영어 미키박쌤을 확인해보세요.

 

감사합니다.