2025년 3월 고2모의고사 변형문제

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(32번) [모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어]

목동미키박영어 2025. 4. 19. 17:50

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(32번)와 정답자료가 필요하시다고요?

 

걱정 마세요! 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어가 해결해 드립니다!

 

 

 

 

3등급도 전교 1등으로! (서울  영일고, 송도 박문여고)

3등급도 전교 2등으로! (서울  목동고)

5등급도 1등급으로! (서울  진명여고)

3등급도 1등급으로! (서울 마포고, 서울 신도림고)

 

모두가 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어와 함께 한 결과입니다.

 

 

 

 

 

목동 현대파리지앙 409호 미키박영어 (010 6693 6636)

 

 

오늘은 2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(32번)와 정답자료를 제공해 드립니다.

 

 

모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어

 

 

좋은 내신 성적은 진심에서 나오는 거 아시죠?

 

32번 지문에 대한 완벽한 이해는 기본이죠?

 

 

 

미키박영어 2025년3월고2모의고사32번해설

안녕하세요 미키박영어입니다. 2025년3월고2모의고사32번해설이 필요하시다고요? 걱정 마세요. 미키박영어...

blog.naver.com

 

 

 

32번 내용 확실히 익히셨으리라 믿고,

 

변형문제 도전 시작합니다!

 

 

 

 

Here we go!

 

 

 

 

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(32번) 

1. 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 어법상 틀린 것은?

 

Great scientists are seldom one­hit wonders. Newton is a prime example: beyond the Newtonian mechanics, he developed the theory of gravitation, calculus, laws of motion, and optimization. In fact, well­known scientists are often involved in multiple discoveries, a phenomenon potentially explained by the Matthew effect. Indeed, an initial success may offer a scientist legitimacy, improve peer perception, provide knowledge of how to score and win, enhance social status, and attract resources and quality collaborators, each of these payoffs further increase her odds of scoring another win. Yet, there is an appealing alternative explanation: Great scientists have multiple hits and consistently succeed in their scientific endeavors simply because they’re exceptionally talented. Therefore, future success again goes to those who have had success earlier, not because of advantages offered by the previous success, but because the earlier success was indicative of a hidden talent. The Matthew effect posits that success alone increases the future probability of success, raising the question: Does status dictate outcomes, or does it simply reflect an underlying talent or quality? In other words, is there really a Matthew effect after all? 

 

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

increase -> increasing

문장 처음부터 보시면, 등위접속사 and 로 동사들이 병렬되어 있음을 알 수 있습니다.

and 의 위치는 제일 마지막 것 앞에 오죠? A, B, C, and D 이렇게 말이죠.

따라서, and attract 가 마지막 동사임을 알 수 있습니다. 

그 뒤에 연결사가 없죠?

연결사가 없다는 의미는 동사는 더 이상 올 수 없다는 것을 의미합니다.

따라서, 번의 자리는 동사가 아닌 준동사입니다. 

독립분사구문이라고 하죠? (주절의 주어와 부사절의 주어가 다른 경우, 주어가 다르기 때문에 생략하지 않고 그 뒤에 분사를 사용하는 경우죠?)

따라서, 분사의 형태인 increasing 이 옳습니다.

 

 

영어 학습자를 위한 독립분사구문 활용법 총정리

독립분사구문 활용법을 찾으신다고요? 이젠 안심하세요! 재미짐영어 미키박쌤이 아주 쉽고, 재밌고, 시원하...

blog.naver.com

 

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(32번) 

2 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 문맥상 어색한 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

Great scientists are seldom one-hit wonders. Newton is a prime example: beyond the Newtonian mechanics, he developed the theory of gravitation, calculus, laws of motion, and optimization. In fact, well-known scientists are often involved in multiple discoveries, a phenomenon potentially explained by the Matthew effect. Indeed, an initial success may offer a scientist legitimacy, improve peer perception, provide knowledge of how to score and win, enhance social status, and attract resources and quality collaborators, each of these payoffs further ① boosting her odds of scoring another win. Yet, there is an appealing alternative explanation: Great scientists have multiple hits and consistently succeed in their scientific endeavors simply because they’re ② highly gifted. Therefore, future success again goes to those who have had success earlier, not because of ③ rewards offered by the previous success, but because the earlier success was ④ reflective of a hidden talent. The Matthew effect posits that success alone ⑤ amplifies the future probability of success, raising the question: Does status dictate outcomes, or does it simply reflect an underlying talent or quality? In other words, is there really a Matthew effect after all? 

 

 


정답은?

 

 

 

 

 


정답
✅ ③ rewards → advantages

해설  
3번 rewards(보상, 상)은 문맥상 어색합니다.
원문에서는 "advantages"(이점, 유리한 조건)이 사용되었으며, 이는 이전의 성공이 가져다주는 객관적 이점들—예: 명성, 자금, 협업 기회 등—을 의미합니다.

반면 rewards는 **일을 잘했을 때 받는 '보상'이나 '칭찬'**의 뉘앙스가 강하며,
여기서 말하는 이전 성공으로부터 얻는 실질적이고 구조적인 혜택들을 충분히 포괄하지 못합니다.
→ 따라서 이 문맥에는 advantages가 더 적절한 표현입니다.

다른 보기의 원문 단어
✔ ① boosting (원문: increasing)
→ Increasing은 ‘증가시키는’, boosting은 ‘올리는, 끌어올리는’이라는 의미로 문맥상 적절한 동의어입니다.

✔ ② highly gifted (원문: exceptionally talented)
→ Exceptionally talented는 ‘특출난 재능이 있는’, highly gifted도 같은 의미로 자연스럽습니다.

✔ ④ reflective (원문: indicative)
→ Indicative는 ‘나타내는, 보여주는’, reflective도 ‘반영하는’이라는 뜻으로 문맥상 적절한 동의어입니다.

✔ ⑤ amplifies (원문: increases)
→ Increases는 ‘늘린다’, amplifies는 ‘확대한다, 증폭시킨다’는 의미로 자연스럽게 대응됩니다. 

 

 

 

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(32번) 

3. 다음 문장에 이어질 글의 순서를 정하시오.

 

Great scientists are seldom one-hit wonders. Newton is a prime example: beyond the Newtonian mechanics, he developed the theory of gravitation, calculus, laws of motion, and optimization.


(A) The Matthew effect posits that success alone increases the future probability of success, raising the question: Does status dictate outcomes, or does it simply reflect an underlying talent or quality? In other words, is there really a Matthew effect after all? 
(B) In fact, well-known scientists are often involved in multiple discoveries, a phenomenon potentially explained by the Matthew effect. Indeed, an initial success may offer a scientist legitimacy, improve peer perception, provide knowledge of how to score and win, enhance social status, and attract resources and quality collaborators, each of these payoffs further increasing her odds of scoring another win. 
(C) Yet, there is an appealing alternative explanation: Great scientists have multiple hits and consistently succeed in their scientific endeavors simply because they’re exceptionally talented. Therefore, future success again goes to those who have had success earlier, not because of advantages offered by the previous success, but because the earlier success was indicative of a hidden talent. 

① (A) - (C) - (B)
② (B) - (A) - (C)
③ (B) - (C) - (A)
④ (C) - (A) - (B)
⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)



정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


✅ 정답:
⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)

✅ 정답에 대한 이유:
**(C)**는 훌륭한 과학자들이 여러 번의 성공을 거두는 이유를 그들의 뛰어난 재능 때문이라고 설명합니다.

**(B)**는 과학자들이 여러 번의 발견에 관여하는 현상을 매튜 효과로 설명, 초기 성공이 과학자의 지위와 자원을 강화하여 미래의 성공 확률을 높인다고 주장합니다.

**(A)**는 매튜 효과가 성공이 더 많은 성공을 이끄는 현상을 설명하며, 상태가 결과를 결정하는지 아니면 잠재력을 반영하는지라는 질문을 제기합니다.

따라서 전개 순서는 **(C) → (B) → (A)**가 가장 자연스럽고 논리적입니다.

 

 

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(32번) 

 

4. 다음 글의 주제로 가장 알맞은 것은?

 

Great scientists are seldom one­hit wonders. Newton is a prime example: beyond the Newtonian mechanics, he developed the theory of gravitation, calculus, laws of motion, and optimization. In fact, well­known scientists are often involved in multiple discoveries, a phenomenon potentially explained by the Matthew effect. Indeed, an initial success may offer a scientist legitimacy, improve peer perception, provide knowledge of how to score and win, enhance social status, and attract resources and quality collaborators, each of these payoffs further increasing her odds of scoring another win. Yet, there is an appealing alternative explanation: Great scientists have multiple hits and consistently succeed in their scientific endeavors simply because they’re exceptionally talented. Therefore, future success again goes to those who have had success earlier, not because of advantages offered by the previous success, but because the earlier success was indicative of a hidden talent. The Matthew effect posits that success alone increases the future probability of success, raising the question: Does status dictate outcomes, or does it simply reflect an underlying talent or quality? In other words, is there really a Matthew effect after all? 

① The importance of peer recognition in scientific achievement
② How talent and resources contribute to scientific progress
③ Whether repeated scientific success is due to status or talent
④ The long-lasting influence of Newton’s scientific contributions
⑤ Why great scientists tend to attract high-quality collaborators

 

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 


정답
③ Whether repeated scientific success is due to status or talent

✅ 정답 해설
이 글은 과학자들의 반복적인 성공이 과거의 성공에서 오는 사회적 지위 때문인지, 아니면 원래 타고난 재능 때문인지에 대한 질문을 중심으로 전개됩니다.

Matthew effect는 "성공한 사람이 더 성공할 가능성이 높다"는 사회학 이론으로, 지위나 인지도가 이후의 성공을 불러온다고 주장함.

하지만 글에서는 그 반대 설명도 제시됨: 과거의 성공은 단지 숨겨진 재능의 신호에 불과할 수 있으며, 재능이 반복적인 성공의 근본 원인일 수 있다는 것.

마지막 문장은 바로 이 논쟁의 핵심을 던짐: “Is there really a Matthew effect after all?”

따라서 글의 핵심 주제는
**③ Whether repeated scientific success is due to status or talent (과학자의 반복적인 성공이 지위 때문인지, 재능 때문인지에 대한 물음)**입니다.

📝 선택지 해석
① The importance of peer recognition in scientific achievement
→ 과학적 성취에서 동료의 인정이 갖는 중요성
(※ 일부 내용이지만 핵심 주제 아님)

② How talent and resources contribute to scientific progress
→ 재능과 자원이 과학 발전에 기여하는 방식
(※ 관련 내용이 있지만 비교/대조 구조가 중심 아님)

③ Whether repeated scientific success is due to status or talent
→ 과학자의 반복적인 성공이 지위 때문인지, 재능 때문인지에 대한 물음 ✅ (정답)

④ The long-lasting influence of Newton’s scientific contributions
→ 뉴턴의 과학적 기여가 미친 장기적 영향
(※ 뉴턴은 예시일 뿐, 주제는 아님)

⑤ Why great scientists tend to attract high-quality collaborators
→ 뛰어난 과학자들이 우수한 협업자를 끌어들이는 이유
(※ 부차적 효과일 뿐, 핵심 주장 아님)

 

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(32번) 

5. 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

 

Great scientists are seldom one­hit wonders. Newton is a prime example: beyond the Newtonian mechanics, he developed the theory of gravitation, calculus, laws of motion, and optimization. In fact, well­known scientists are often involved in multiple discoveries, a phenomenon potentially explained by the Matthew effect. Indeed, an initial success may offer a scientist legitimacy, improve peer perception, provide knowledge of how to score and win, enhance social status, and attract resources and quality collaborators, each of these payoffs further increasing her odds of scoring another win. Yet, there is an appealing alternative explanation: Great scientists have multiple hits and consistently succeed in their scientific endeavors simply because they’re exceptionally talented. Therefore, future success again goes to those who have had success earlier, not because of advantages offered by the previous success, but because the earlier success was indicative of a hidden talent. The Matthew effect posits that success alone increases the future probability of success, raising the question: Does status dictate outcomes, or does it simply reflect an underlying talent or quality? In other words, is there really a Matthew effect after all? 

The repeated success of great scientists may stem from either external (A)_________ or internal (B)____________.
         (A)                      (B)
① pressure                 preference
② advantages              talent
③ criticism                  effort
④ recognition             education
⑤ popularity               environment

 

 


정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 


✅ 정답: ② advantages ··· talent
✨ 해설:
(A) advantages (이점, 혜택)
→ 지문 전반에서 Matthew effect는 초기 성공이 사회적 지위, 자원, 협력자 등을 불러와 미래 성공 가능성을 높이는 외부적 이점이라고 설명합니다.

(B) talent (재능)
→ 대안 설명에서는 “earlier success was indicative of a hidden talent”라고 언급되며, 반복된 성공은 내재된 재능 때문이라는 주장도 제시됩니다.

📌 오답 해설

① pressure / preference: 외부 압력과 개인적 선호는 언급되지 않음

③ criticism / effort: 비판이나 노력도 중심 주제가 아님

④ recognition / education: 인지나 교육도 간접적 요소일 뿐 핵심은 아님

⑤ popularity / environment: 인기와 환경은 이 맥락에 적절하지 않음

 

 

 

 

 

지금까지 모의고사변형문제월드 목동 미키박영어

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(32번)와 정답자료습니다.

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(33번)와 정답자료도 확인해보실까요?

 

 

 

이 외에도

구글다음네이버유튜브에서 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어라고 검색하시면

정말 많은 모의고사 변형문제 자료들을 무료로 활용하실 수 있습니다.

 

 

그리고, 영문법에 대한 유용한 자료는

재미짐영어 미키박쌤을 확인해보세요.

 

감사합니다.