2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(22번) [모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어]

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(22번)와 정답자료가 필요하시다고요?

 

걱정 마세요! 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어가 해결해 드립니다!

 

 

 

 

 

 

3등급도 전교 1등으로! (서울  영일고, 송도 박문여고)

3등급도 전교 2등으로! (서울  목동고)

5등급도 1등급으로! (서울  진명여고)

3등급도 1등급으로! (서울 마포고, 서울 신도림고)

 

모두가 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어와 함께 한 결과입니다.

 

 

 

 

 

목동 현대파리지앙 409호 미키박영어 (010 6693 6636)

 

 

오늘은 2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(22번)와 정답자료를 제공해 드립니다.

 

 

 

모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어

 

좋은 내신 성적은 진심에서 나오는 거 아시죠?

 

22번 지문에 대한 완벽한 이해는 기본이죠?

 

미키박영어 2025년5월고3모의고사22번해설

 

 

22번 내용 확실히 익히셨으리라 믿고,

 

변형문제 도전 시작합니다!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here we go!

 

 

 

 

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(22번) 

1. 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 어법상 틀린 것은?

 

Whether or not an observation is evidence for a person ①to depend crucially on what the person is bringing to the table in terms of background knowledge. The physician sees the Koplik spots as Koplik spots and thereby gains evidence for her belief ②that the patient is coming down with the measles. I, a nonexpert, see the same spots, but I do not see them as Koplik spots. Thus, they are not evidence for me, because they don’t provide me with good reasons for believing that I am confronted with a case of the measles. Only observations that are seen as this or that can be evidence for (or against) some hypothesis. Another way of putting the same point ③is this: During the processing of sensory stimuli, we bring ― often automatically ― various categories, background knowledge, and similar things, to bear. Thus, categorized observations are ④what constitutes evidence. Some might worry that we are overintellectualizing evidence. However, it seems to us that in the empirical sciences, unconceptualized experiences hardly ever ⑤play a role as evidence.  

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

①to depend -> depends

주어가 명사절이죠?

주어가 명사절이면 두 번째 동사가 진짜 동사이며, 이 경우 단수동사를 써야 합니다.

따라서, depends 가 옳습니다.

to depend 는 동사가 아닌 준동사입니다.

 

준동사

 

 

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(22번) 

2 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 문맥상 어색한 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

Whether or not an observation is evidence for a person depends crucially on what the person is bringing to the table in terms of background knowledge. The physician sees the Koplik spots as Koplik spots and thereby ① gains evidence for her belief that the patient is coming down with the measles. I, a nonexpert, see the same spots, but I do not see them as Koplik spots. Thus, they are not evidence for me, because they don’t provide me with good reasons for believing that I am ② confronted with a case of the measles. Only observations that are ③ witnessed as this or that can be evidence for (or against) some hypothesis. Another way of putting the same point is this: During the processing of sensory stimuli, we bring ― often ④ automatically ― various categories, background knowledge, and similar things, to bear. Thus, categorized observations are what constitutes evidence. Some might worry that we are overintellectualizing evidence. However, it seems to us that in the ⑤ scientific sciences, unconceptualized experiences hardly ever play a role as evidence. 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

정답:
③ witnessed → seen

해설:
③ witnessed는 문맥상 어색한 표현입니다.
원문에서는 "seen"(보이다)이 사용되어야 했습니다.

→ **"Witnessed"**는 보통 **'목격하다'**의 의미로, 사건이나 특정한 상황을 직접적으로 본 사람을 지칭할 때 사용됩니다. 여기서 말하는 "observations"(관찰)나 "evidence"(증거)는 주관적인 관점에서 **단순히 "보는 것"**을 나타내므로, **"seen"**이 더 적합합니다. **"Witnessed"**는 목격하거나 증언하는 것에 더 적합하며, 이 경우에는 자연스럽지 않습니다.

다른 보기들의 원문 단어:
✔ ① gains (원문: gains)
→ Gains는 '얻다'로, 객관적으로 증거를 얻은 상황에서 적합한 단어입니다.
✔ ② confronted (원문: confronted)
→ Confronted는 '직면한'으로, 문맥상 상황을 맞닥뜨린다는 의미로 적절합니다.
✔ ④ automatically (원문: automatically)
→ Automatically는 '자동적으로'로, 문맥에 잘 맞는 단어입니다.
✔ ⑤ scientific (원문: empirical)
→ Empirical은 ‘경험적인’으로, 과학적이고 실험적인 증거에 관한 문맥에서 적합한 단어입니다. "Scientific"은 과학적인의 의미로 적합하지만 **"empirical"**이 더 구체적입니다.

 

 

 

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(22번) 

3. 다음 문장에 이어질 글의 순서를 정하시오.

 

Whether or not an observation is evidence for a person depends crucially on what the person is bringing to the table in terms of background knowledge. The physician sees the Koplik spots as Koplik spots and thereby gains evidence for her belief that the patient is coming down with the measles. 

(A) Thus, categorized observations are what constitutes evidence. Some might worry that we are overintellectualizing evidence. However, it seems to us that in the empirical sciences, unconceptualized experiences hardly ever play a role as evidence.
(B) I, a nonexpert, see the same spots, but I do not see them as Koplik spots. Thus, they are not evidence for me, because they don’t provide me with good reasons for believing that I am confronted with a case of the measles.
(C) Only observations that are seen as this or that can be evidence for (or against) some hypothesis. Another way of putting the same point is this: During the processing of sensory stimuli, we bring ― often automatically ― various categories, background knowledge, and similar things, to bear.
① (A) - (C) - (B)
② (B) - (A) - (C)
③ (B) - (C) - (A)
④ (C) - (A) - (B)
⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답:
③ (B) - (C) - (A)

✅ 정답에 대한 이유:
**(B)**는 의사와는 달리 비전문가가 동일한 관찰을 다르게 해석함으로써 그것이 증거가 되지 않는다는 상황을 설명합니다.

**(C)**는 왜 관찰이 증거가 되려면 카테고리화된 인식이 필요한지를 논리적으로 일반화하며 이어집니다.

**(A)**는 이러한 논지를 받아 정리하면서, 일부가 걱정할 수 있는 지나치게 지적인 해석이라는 비판도 반영하고, 과학에서는 비개념적 경험이 증거로 거의 쓰이지 않는다는 결론을 내립니다.

**(B → C → A)**는 구체적 사례 → 일반적 원리 → 결론 및 반론 고려의 전개 구조로 논리적 흐름이 자연스럽습니다.

 

 

 

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(22번) 

 

4. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 가장 알맞은 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

When evaluating evidence, the interpretation of an observation depends greatly on what the observer already knows. For example, a physician may recognize a set of symptoms, such as Koplik spots, and immediately conclude that the patient is likely suffering from measles. However, someone without medical expertise, like myself, may notice the same spots but fail to recognize them as Koplik spots. For me, these observations are not evidence of measles because I do not interpret them in a way that supports the hypothesis. In other words, only observations that are categorized and interpreted in certain ways can serve as evidence for or against a hypothesis. This categorization is shaped by the observer's background knowledge, and it is this process that turns raw sensory data into meaningful evidence. While some may argue that this approach is overly intellectual, in scientific inquiry, raw, unprocessed sensory experiences rarely contribute to evidence. __________.  
① Evidence can be accepted regardless of one’s background knowledge
② Interpretation of observations is influenced by background knowledge
③ Sensory stimuli do not require background knowledge for interpretation
④ The physician is often wrong in interpreting medical symptoms
⑤ Background knowledge has no impact on what constitutes evidence

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

정답: ② Interpretation of observations is influenced by background knowledge


풀이:
2번 "Interpretation of observations is influenced by background knowledge" (관찰의 해석은 배경 지식에 영향을 받는다)는 지문에서 강조된 핵심입니다. 지문에서는 의사가 Koplik spots를 인식하고 그것을 홍역의 증거로 해석하는 반면, 비전문가는 동일한 증상을 보더라도 이를 홍역의 증거로 해석하지 못한다고 설명하고 있습니다. 이는 배경 지식에 따라 관찰의 해석이 달라진다는 점을 강조한 것입니다.
1번은 "배경 지식에 관계없이 증거를 받아들일 수 있다"는 내용으로, 지문에서의 설명과 반대되는 주장입니다.
3번은 "감각 자극은 배경 지식 없이 해석될 수 있다"는 주장도 잘못된 설명입니다.
4번은 "의사가 의학적 증상을 해석할 때 자주 틀린다"는 내용은 지문에서 다루는 핵심이 아니므로 틀립니다.
5번은 "배경 지식이 증거에 영향을 미치지 않는다"는 내용은 지문과 반대되는 내용입니다.

어휘 정리:
observation 관찰
evidence 증거
background knowledge 배경 지식
hypothesis 가설
sensory stimuli 감각 자극
categorized 범주화된
conceptualized 개념화된
empirical 경험적인
interpretation 해석
unconventional 비정상적인

 

 

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(22번) 

5. 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

 

Whether or not an observation is evidence for a person depends crucially on what the person is bringing to the table in terms of background knowledge. The physician sees the Koplik spots as Koplik spots and thereby gains evidence for her belief that the patient is coming down with the measles. I, a nonexpert, see the same spots, but I do not see them as Koplik spots. Thus, they are not evidence for me, because they don’t provide me with good reasons for believing that I am confronted with a case of the measles. Only observations that are seen as this or that can be evidence for (or against) some hypothesis. Another way of putting the same point is this: During the processing of sensory stimuli, we bring ― often automatically ― various categories, background knowledge, and similar things, to bear. Thus, categorized observations are what constitutes evidence. Some might worry that we are overintellectualizing evidence. However, it seems to us that in the empirical sciences, unconceptualized experiences hardly ever play a role as evidence.  

↓

In science, whether an observation counts as evidence depends on the observer’s (A)_________ and (B)__________.
        (A)                             (B)
① memory                     curiosity
② objectivity                  experience
③ knowledge                categorization
④ perception                 confidence
⑤ reasoning                   imagination

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ③ knowledge ··· categorization

✨ 해설:
(A) knowledge (지식)
→ 지문에서는 “what the person is bringing to the table in terms of background knowledge”라는 구절을 통해, 관찰을 해석하고 판단하는 데 있어 배경 지식이 결정적이라고 설명합니다.

(B) categorization (범주화)
→ “categorized observations are what constitutes evidence”라는 문장에서, 관찰은 특정한 범주로 인식될 때 비로소 증거가 된다는 점이 강조됩니다.

📌 오답 해설

① memory / curiosity: 기억이나 호기심은 언급되지 않음

② objectivity / experience: 객관성과 단순한 경험은 핵심이 아님

④ perception / confidence: 지각이나 자신감보다는 지식과 범주화가 중심

⑤ reasoning / imagination: 추론이나 상상은 증거 형성의 핵심 요소로 언급되지 않음

 

 

 

 

 

 

지금까지 모의고사변형문제월드 목동 미키박영어의

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(22번)와 정답자료였습니다.

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(23번)와 정답자료도 확인해보실까요?

 

 

 

이 외에도

구글, 다음, 네이버, 유튜브에서 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어라고 검색하시면

정말 많은 모의고사 변형문제 자료들을 무료로 활용하실 수 있습니다.

 

 

그리고, 영문법에 대한 유용한 자료는

재미짐영어 미키박쌤을 확인해보세요.

 

감사합니다.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

이 블로그의 모든 콘텐츠(글, 이미지, 동영상 등)는 저작권법에 의해 보호받습니다. 본 블로그의 콘텐츠는 무단 복제, 수정, 배포 또는 상업적 이용을 금지합니다. 저작권 침해 시 법적 조치를 취할 수 있습니다. 
© 2025 미키박영어 All Rights Reserved.

All content on this blog (text, images, videos, etc.) is protected by copyright law. Unauthorized reproduction, modification, distribution, or commercial use of any content is prohibited. Legal actions may be taken in case of copyright infringement. 
© 2025 미키박영어 All Rights Reserved.