2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(29번) [모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어]

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(29번)와 정답자료가 필요하시다고요?

 

걱정 마세요! 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어가 해결해 드립니다!

 

 

 

 

 

 

3등급도 전교 1등으로! (서울  영일고, 송도 박문여고)

3등급도 전교 2등으로! (서울  목동고)

5등급도 1등급으로! (서울  진명여고)

3등급도 1등급으로! (서울 마포고, 서울 신도림고)

 

모두가 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어와 함께 한 결과입니다.

 

 

 

 

 

목동 현대파리지앙 409호 미키박영어 (010 6693 6636)

 

 

오늘은 2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(29번)와 정답자료를 제공해 드립니다.

 

 

모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어

 

 

좋은 내신 성적은 진심에서 나오는 거 아시죠?

 

29번 지문에 대한 완벽한 이해는 기본이죠?

 

미키박영어 2025년5월고3모의고사29번해설

 

 

29번 내용 확실히 익히셨으리라 믿고,

 

변형문제 도전 시작합니다!

 

 

 

 

Here we go!

 

 

 

 

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(29번) 

1. 다음 글의 주제로 가장 알맞은 것은?

 

Working with neuroscientists who use neuroimaging to understand how the human brain works, anthropologist Simon Cohn has shown the extent to which scientists need to develop personal, even intimate, relationships with their subjects in order to secure their cooperation. Only by enlisting subjects in a social relationship, even if briefly, do the researchers feel they can depend on the subjects to follow directions to the best of their ability. Strapped down uncomfortably in a dark, noisy scanner, subjects must nonetheless pay attention and follow directions in order to produce data the researchers can use. Before the subjects ever enter the scanner, researchers provide them with reassurance and sympathy and share personal experiences, creating a subjective alliance between researcher and subject. Although these tactics might influence the specific subjective experiences revealed in the scanner, they are carefully eliminated from the experimental reports so that only the signals from subjects’ brains in response to stimuli in the scanner come to light.
① The ethical concerns of using human subjects in neuroscience research
② The limitations of brain scanning in understanding subjective experience
③ The hidden role of personal interaction in producing valid neuroscience data
④ How researchers avoid bias when interpreting neuroimaging results
⑤ The differences between anthropological and neuroscientific research methods

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

정답
③ The hidden role of personal interaction in producing valid neuroscience data

✅ 정답 해설
이 글의 핵심은 유효한 뇌과학 실험 데이터를 얻기 위해 연구자와 피험자 간의 개인적이고 사회적인 상호작용이 필수적이라는 점입니다.

신경과학자들이 정확한 데이터를 얻기 위해 피험자와 유대감 형성을 시도하며,

불편한 실험 환경에서도 피험자가 최대한 협조하도록 만드는 감정적·사회적 관계를 맺는다는 점이 강조됩니다.

그러나 실험 보고서에는 이러한 인간적 상호작용이 철저히 제거된 채, 오직 기계적인 두뇌 반응만 기록됨.

이로 인해 “과학적 객관성” 뒤에 숨겨진 주관적 요소가 실재함을 보여주는 글입니다.

따라서 가장 적절한 주제는
**③ The hidden role of personal interaction in producing valid neuroscience data (유효한 뇌과학 데이터를 생성하는 데 있어 개인적 상호작용의 숨겨진 역할)**입니다.

📝 선택지 해석
① The ethical concerns of using human subjects in neuroscience research
→ 신경과학 연구에서 인간 피험자 사용의 윤리적 문제
(❌ 윤리보다는 관계 형성과 데이터 신뢰성이 중심)

② The limitations of brain scanning in understanding subjective experience
→ 뇌 스캔으로 주관적 경험을 이해하는 데 한계
(❌ 한계보다는 사회적 상호작용의 필요성이 중심)

③ The hidden role of personal interaction in producing valid neuroscience data
→ 유효한 뇌과학 데이터를 생성하는 데 있어 개인적 상호작용의 숨겨진 역할 ✅ (정답)

④ How researchers avoid bias when interpreting neuroimaging results
→ 신경영상 결과를 해석할 때 편향을 피하는 방법
(❌ 오히려 보고서에서 상호작용을 제거함을 지적하고 있음)

⑤ The differences between anthropological and neuroscientific research methods
→ 인류학과 신경과학의 연구 방법 차이
(❌ 방법론 비교는 주제가 아님)

 

 

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(29번) 

2 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 문맥상 어색한 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

Working with neuroscientists who use neuroimaging to understand how the human brain works, anthropologist Simon Cohn has shown the extent to which scientists need to develop personal, even ①close relationships with their subjects in order to secure their cooperation. Only by enlisting subjects in a social relationship, even if briefly, do the researchers feel they can depend on the subjects to ②obey directions to the best of their ability. Strapped down uncomfortably in a dark, noisy scanner, subjects must nonetheless pay attention and ③repeat directions in order to produce data the researchers can use. Before the subjects ever enter the scanner, researchers provide them with reassurance and sympathy and share personal experiences, creating a ④emotional alliance between researcher and subject. Although these tactics might influence the specific subjective experiences revealed in the scanner, they are carefully ⑤deleted from the experimental reports so that only the signals from subjects’ brains in response to stimuli in the scanner come to light. 

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ③ repeat

 

📌 해설:
③ repeat: 문맥상 부적절한 단어입니다.
이 문장에서 피험자(subjects)가 해야 할 일은 **지시를 듣고 따라야 한다(follow directions)**는 것이지, 지시를 반복해서 말해야 하는(repeat) 것이 아닙니다.
‘repeat directions’는 ‘지시를 반복하다’는 의미로, 이 상황에서는 의미가 어색합니다.

📘 나머지 보기 설명:
① close: intimate의 쉬운 표현으로, ‘친밀한’이라는 뜻에서 적절합니다.

② obey: follow와 유사하게 ‘지시에 따르다’는 의미로, 실험 맥락에 적합합니다.

④ emotional: subjective 대신 사용할 수 있는 표현으로, 감정적 유대라는 의미에서 적절합니다.

⑤ deleted: eliminated의 일상적 대체어로, 실험 보고서에서 정보를 제거한다는 뜻에서 자연스럽습니다.

 

 

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(29번) 

3. 다음 문장에 이어질 글의 순서를 정하시오.

 

Working with neuroscientists who use neuroimaging to understand how the human brain works, anthropologist Simon Cohn has shown the extent to which scientists need to develop personal, even intimate, relationships with their subjects in order to secure their cooperation. 

(A) Although these tactics might influence the specific subjective experiences revealed in the scanner, they are carefully eliminated from the experimental reports so that only the signals from subjects’ brains in response to stimuli in the scanner come to light.
(B) Strapped down uncomfortably in a dark, noisy scanner, subjects must nonetheless pay attention and follow directions in order to produce data the researchers can use.
(C) Only by enlisting subjects in a social relationship, even if briefly, do the researchers feel they can depend on the subjects to follow directions to the best of their ability.
① (A) - (C) - (B)
② (B) - (A) - (C)
③ (B) - (C) - (A)
④ (C) - (A) - (B)
⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답:
⑤ (C) - (B) - (A)

✅ 정답에 대한 이유:
**(C)**는 주제문(개인적 관계의 중요성)을 구체화하며, 왜 과학자들이 피험자와 사회적 관계를 맺으려 하는지에 대한 전제 조건을 제시합니다.

**(B)**는 그런 사회적 관계가 필요한 이유를 보여주며, 실제 스캐너 안의 긴장된 상황에서도 피험자가 지시를 따를 수 있어야 한다는 실용적 측면을 설명합니다.

**(A)**는 앞서 사용된 공감적 접근 방식이 실험 결과에 미칠 영향을 과학자들이 어떻게 처리하는지, 즉 그 주관적 요소를 실험 보고서에서는 어떻게 배제하는지를 정리하며 마무리합니다.

이처럼 **(C → B → A)**는 조건 제시 → 실험 상황 설명 → 과학적 처리 방식의 결론이라는 구조로 논리적 완성도가 높습니다.

 

 

 

 

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(29번) 

 

4. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 가장 알맞은 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

Anthropologist Simon Cohn, collaborating with neuroscientists studying the human brain through imaging technology, has revealed an important but often overlooked aspect of research. In order to gather reliable data, scientists must form a social connection with their participants—even if only briefly. This relationship helps ensure that participants stay focused and follow instructions, which is critical for producing usable results during brain scans. Participants are often placed in stressful situations, lying still in dark, noisy machines. In response, researchers try to build trust by offering reassurance, showing empathy, and sometimes even sharing personal stories. These efforts create a temporary emotional bond, which helps subjects cooperate more fully during the experiment. Interestingly, while this interpersonal interaction is central to the research process, it is intentionally left out of published scientific reports. Instead, those reports focus only on the measurable brain responses to specific stimuli, treating the interaction as though it never occurred. This suggests that ____________________________. 
① the social dynamics of experimentation are essential but deliberately hidden in formal scientific documentation
② researchers rely solely on objective measures and avoid engaging with participants emotionally
③ the scanner environment has no influence on how subjects respond during experiments
④ personal connections between researchers and participants distort the entire research process
⑤ neuroimaging technology is advanced enough to eliminate the need for human cooperation

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

정답 : ① the social dynamics of experimentation are essential but deliberately hidden in formal scientific documentation

 

정답 해설
지문은 신뢰할 만한 데이터를 얻기 위해 연구자들이 피험자와 사회적·감정적 유대감을 형성해야 한다고 설명합니다. 이러한 유대감은 실험 수행에 있어 핵심적인 역할을 하지만, 논문이나 공식 보고서에는 명시적으로 드러나지 않는다는 점이 강조됩니다. 이 내용을 정확히 요약한 선택지는 ①번입니다.

② 감정적 교류를 피한다는 말은 지문과 반대

③ 실험 환경이 반응에 영향을 미치지 않는다는 주장도 지문과 모순

④ 개인적 연결이 연구를 왜곡시킨다는 내용은 지문에 없음

⑤ 기술만으로 협력이 필요 없다는 말도 지문과 정반대

어휘 정리
neuroimaging 뇌 영상 기술
intimate relationship 친밀한 관계
enlist someone ~의 협조를 얻다, 참여를 유도하다
strapped down 단단히 고정된, 묶인
stimuli 자극
reassurance 안심, 위로
subjective alliance 주관적 유대감, 심리적 연결
eliminate 제거하다
measurable brain response 측정 가능한 뇌 반응
scientific documentation 과학적 기록, 공식 보고 문서

 

 

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(29번) 

5. 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

 

Working with neuroscientists who use neuroimaging to understand how the human brain works, anthropologist Simon Cohn has shown the extent to which scientists need to develop personal, even intimate, relationships with their subjects in order to secure their cooperation. Only by enlisting subjects in a social relationship, even if briefly, do the researchers feel they can depend on the subjects to follow directions to the best of their ability. Strapped down uncomfortably in a dark, noisy scanner, subjects must nonetheless pay attention and follow directions in order to produce data the researchers can use. Before the subjects ever enter the scanner, researchers provide them with reassurance and sympathy and share personal experiences, creating a subjective alliance between researcher and subject. Although these tactics might influence the specific subjective experiences revealed in the scanner, they are carefully eliminated from the experimental reports so that only the signals from subjects’ brains in response to stimuli in the scanner come to light. 

↓

To ensure data quality, researchers build social (A)_____________ with participants, though such efforts are excluded from scientific (B)_____________.
           (A)                          (B)
① authority                 procedures
② detachment            findings
③ relationships          reports
④ experiments           ethics
⑤ alliances                equipment

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ③ relationships ··· reports

✨ 해설:
(A) relationships (관계)
→ 지문에는 “personal, even intimate, relationships with their subjects”, “subjective alliance” 등 표현을 통해 연구 참여자들과의 인간적 관계 형성이 핵심임을 보여줍니다.

(B) reports (보고서)
→ “they are carefully eliminated from the experimental reports”라는 문장에서 알 수 있듯, 이러한 관계 형성의 노력은 공식 실험 보고서에서는 제외됨이 명시되어 있습니다.

📌 오답 해설

① authority / procedures: 연구자 권위나 실험 절차는 지문과 맞지 않음

② detachment / findings: 연구자와의 분리(detachment)는 반대 개념이며, findings도 초점 아님

④ experiments / ethics: 실험이나 윤리는 지문 내 핵심 요소가 아님

⑤ alliances / equipment: 장비는 지문 후반부 내용과 관련 없음

 

 

 

 

 

 

지금까지 모의고사변형문제월드 목동 미키박영어의

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(29번)와 정답자료였습니다.

 

2025년5월고3모의고사변형문제(30번)와 정답자료도 확인해보실까요?

 

 

 

이 외에도

구글, 다음, 네이버, 유튜브에서 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어라고 검색하시면

정말 많은 모의고사 변형문제 자료들을 무료로 활용하실 수 있습니다.

 

 

그리고, 영문법에 대한 유용한 자료는

재미짐영어 미키박쌤을 확인해보세요.

 

감사합니다.