2023년 5월 고3 모의고사 34번 해설, 어휘 정리, 변형문제

안녕하세요 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박쌤입니다.

 

 

3등급이 전교 1등으로!

(목동 영일고, 송도 박문여고)

 

 

바로 미키박쌤과 함께라 가능했습니다!

 

 

오늘은 2023년 5월 고3 모의고사 34번 해설, 어휘정리,변형문제입니다.

 

 

5월모의고사

먼저

 

한 줄 해석 및 중요 문법 사항을 확인하시고, 33번 변형문제를 풀어보시겠습니다.

 

시작할까요?

 

 

 

 

Here we go!

 

Here we go!

 

한줄 해석 및 어법 핵심 포인트 공략

 

In Hegel’s philosophy, even though there is interaction and interrelation between the universal and the individual, the universal still has (having - X) more priority than the individual.

헤겔의 철학에서 비록 보편자와 개별자 사이에 상호 작용과 상호 관계가 있긴 하지만 보편자는 여전히 개별자보다 더 많은 우위를 갖는다. 

 

has (having - X) : 부사절 even though ~ individual 을 빼도 나머지 부분은 완전문입니다.

따라서, the universal 이 주어이므로 동사의 형태인 has 가 옳습니다.

 

동사와 준동사의 개념 구분 :

준동사

 

 

 

For Hegel, individuals are not distinguished in terms of Reason.

헤겔에게 개인은 ‘이성’의 관점에서는 구별되지 않는다.

 

 

 

In Philosophy of Right Hegel stresses particularity and universality as follows: “A man, who acts perversely, exhibits (exhibiting - X) particularity.

Philosophy of Right에서 헤겔은 다음과 같이 특수성과 보편성을 강조한다. ‘사람은 별나게 행동하는데, 특수성을 보여 준다. 

 

exhibits (exhibiting - X) : 주어가 A man 이고 그 뒤에 관계대명사 who 가 왔으니 그 다음엔 동사가 2개 와야 합니다.

관계대명사 who는 '연결사'이므로 동사가 2개가 있어야 합니다.

따라서, 두 번째 동사인 exhibits 가 진짜 동사입니다.

 

연결사의 개념 확인하기 :

연결사

 

 

 

 

The rational is the highway on which everyone travels, and no one is specially marked.”

이성적인 것은 모든 사람이 이동하는 고속 도로이며, 아무도 특별하게 표시되지 않는다.’ 

 

 

on which :전치사 + 관계대명사 + 완전문입니다. 

시험에서는 이런 경우, 관계대명사 which 를 what으로 바꿔 출제되기도 합니다. 속지 마세요!

 

구분은 쉽습니다.

전치사 + 관계대명사 + 완전문

전치사 + what + 불완전문 입니다.

 

전치사 + 관계대명사에 대한 자세한 설명 알아보기 : 

목동영어 미키박쌤의 전치사 + 관계대명사 설명+문제+정답

 

 

 

Here, Hegel maintains that individuals can be differentiated from each other in terms of their acts but they are not differentiated with respect to reason.

여기서 헤겔은 개인이 그들의 행동의 관점에서는 서로 구별될 수 있지만 이성의 측면에서는 구별되지 않는다고 주장한다. 

 

 

 

There are specific thoughts, but they are finally resolved into the universal.

특수한 생각은 있지만 그것들은 결국 보편자로 귀착된다. 

 

 

 

One might say that Hegel seems to focus on the individual like Aristotle but in reality, he subtly treats the universal as fundamental (fundamentally - X) whereas Aristotle considers the individual as primary substance and universal as secondary substance; in so doing Aristotle emphasizes (emphasizing - X) the universal to be subordinate to the individual in contrast to Hegel.

혹자는 헤겔이 아리스토텔레스처럼 개별자에만 초점을 맞춘 것으로 보인다고 말할 수도 있지만 아리스토텔레스가 개별자를 제일(第一) 실체로, 보편자를 제이(第二) 실체로 여기고, 그렇게 하는 것을 통해 헤겔과는 반대로 보편자가 개별자에게 종속된다고 강조하는 것과는 달리 실제로 그(헤겔)는 미묘하게 보편자를 근본적인 것으로 다룬다.

 

 

fundamental (fundamentally - X) : as + 형용사 혹은 명사만 가능합니다. (보어의 자리로 간주되기 때문입니다)

따라서, 형용사인 fundamental 이 옳습니다.

 

emphasizes (emphasizing - X) : 앞의 세미콜론(;)은 접속사 역할을 합니다. 따라서, 그 뒤에는 완전문이 와야 하죠.

그러므로  Aristotle 가 주어이고 emphasizes 가 동사 자리입니다. 

동사와 준동사의 개념 구분 : 

준동사

 

 

 

 

내용 및 어법 포인트 전부 확실해졌죠?

 

 

그럼 이제 어휘를 확인해 볼까요?

 

 

영어	한국어	동의어
interaction	상호작용	interchange, communication
interrelation	상호관계	connection, relationship
priority	우선순위	precedence, preference
individual	개인	person, individuality
distinguished	구별된	differentiated, separate
Reason	이성	rationality, logic
particularity	특수성	specificity, uniqueness
universality	보편성	generality, commonality
acts	행위	actions, behaviors
differentiated	구별된	distinguished, separate
respect to	~에 관하여	regarding, concerning
thoughts	생각	ideas, notions
resolved	해결된	settled, resolved
fundamental	근본적인	essential, basic
primary substance	일차적인 물질	fundamental substance, primary matter
secondary substance	이차적인 물질	derived substance, secondary matter
subordinate	종속된	inferior, subservient

 

 

 

이제, 내용도, 어법 핵심 포인트도, 어휘도 전부 확인하셨죠?

 

아주 잘 하셨습니다.

 

 

그럼, 변형문제를 풀어볼까요?

 

 

모의고사변형문제월드 미키박쌤

 

 

 

 

변형문제 1

다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 어법상 틀린 것은?

In Hegel’s philosophy, even though there is interaction and interrelation between the universal and the individual, the universal still ①has more priority than the individual. For Hegel, individuals are not distinguished in terms of Reason. In Philosophy of Right Hegel stresses particularity and universality as follows: “A man, who acts perversely, ②exhibits particularity. The rational is the highway on ③what everyone travels, and no one is specially marked.” Here, Hegel maintains that individuals can be differentiated from each other in terms of their acts but they are not differentiated with respect to reason. There are specific thoughts, but they are finally ④resolved into the universal. One might say that Hegel seems to focus on the individual like Aristotle but in reality, he subtly treats the universal as ⑤fundamental whereas Aristotle considers the individual as primary substance and universal as secondary substance; in so doing Aristotle emphasizes the universal to be subordinate to the individual in contrast to Hegel.

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

③what  -> which 

The rational is the highway on ③what everyone travels, and no one is specially marked.”

 

on which + 완전문 (everyone travels)

on what + 불완전문 입니다.

 

 

전치사 + 관계대명사 다시 살펴보기 

목동영어 미키박쌤의 전치사 + 관계대명사 설명+문제+정답

 

 

관계대명사 what 다시 살펴보기 : 

관계대명사 what

 

 

 

 

변형문제 2

다음 밑줄친 부분 중 문맥상 어색한 것은? (원문 변형 문제입니다.)

In Hegel’s philosophy, even though there is interaction and interrelation between the universal and the individual, the universal still has more ①precedence than the individual. For Hegel, individuals are not ②differentiated in terms of Reason. In Philosophy of Right Hegel stresses particularity and universality as follows: “A man, who acts perversely, exhibits particularity. The rational is the highway on which everyone travels, and no one is specially ③designated.” Here, Hegel maintains that individuals can be differentiated from each other in terms of their acts but they are not differentiated with respect to reason. There are specific thoughts, but they are finally resolved into the ④specific. One might say that Hegel seems to focus on the individual like Aristotle but in reality, he subtly treats the universal as fundamental whereas Aristotle considers the individual as primary substance and universal as secondary substance; in so doing Aristotle emphasizes the universal to be ⑤subsidiary to the individual in contrast to Hegel.

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

④specific (특정한) -> universal 

 

참고 :

 

①precedence (원문 : priority)

②differentiated (원문 : distinguished )

③designated (원문 : marked )

⑤subsidiary (원문 : subordinate )

 

 

 

 

 

 

변형문제 3

다음 글에 이어질 순서를 정하시오.

In Hegel’s philosophy, even though there is interaction and interrelation between the universal and the individual, the universal still has more priority than the individual.

(A) Here, Hegel maintains that individuals can be differentiated from each other in terms of their acts but they are not differentiated with respect to reason. There are specific thoughts, but they are finally resolved into the universal. (B) For Hegel, individuals are not distinguished in terms of Reason. In Philosophy of Right Hegel stresses particularity and universality as follows: “A man, who acts perversely, exhibits particularity. The rational is the highway on which everyone travels, and no one is specially marked.” (C) One might say that Hegel seems to focus on the individual like Aristotle but in reality, he subtly treats the universal as fundamental whereas Aristotle considers the individual as primary substance and universal as secondary substance; in so doing Aristotle emphasizes the universal to be subordinate to the individual in contrast to Hegel.

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B-A-C

 

 

 

 

변형문제 4

다음 중 글의 흐름과 무관한 것은?

In Hegel’s philosophy, even though there is interaction and interrelation between the universal and the individual, the universal still has more priority than the individual. For Hegel, individuals are not distinguished in terms of Reason. ①In Philosophy of Right Hegel stresses particularity and universality as follows: “A man, who acts perversely, exhibits particularity. The rational is the highway on which everyone travels, and no one is specially marked.” ②Indeed, some philosophers, including Hegel, were inclined to draw on the specific thinking skills, leading to peculiarity differentiated from common sense. ③Here, Hegel maintains that individuals can be differentiated from each other in terms of their acts but they are not differentiated with respect to reason. ④There are specific thoughts, but they are finally resolved into the universal. ⑤One might say that Hegel seems to focus on the individual like Aristotle but in reality, he subtly treats the universal as fundamental whereas Aristotle considers the individual as primary substance and universal as secondary substance; in so doing Aristotle emphasizes the universal to be subordinate to the individual in contrast to Hegel.

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

②Indeed, some philosophers, including Hegel, were inclined to draw on the specific thinking skills, leading to peculiarity differentiated from common sense.

②실제로 Hegel을 비롯한 일부 철학자들은 특정한 사고력에 의존하는 경향이 있어 상식과 구별되는 특이성을 낳았다.

 

 

 

 

 

변형문제 5

다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 알맞은 것은?

In Hegel’s philosophy, even though there is interaction and interrelation between the universal and the individual, the universal still has more priority than the individual. For Hegel, individuals are not distinguished in terms of Reason. In Philosophy of Right Hegel stresses particularity and universality as follows: “A man, who acts perversely, exhibits particularity. The rational is the highway on which everyone travels, and no one is specially marked.” Here, Hegel maintains that individuals can be differentiated from each other in terms of their acts but they are not differentiated with respect to reason. There are specific thoughts, but they are finally resolved into the universal. One might say that Hegel seems to focus on the individual like Aristotle but in reality, he subtly treats the universal as fundamental whereas Aristotle considers the individual as primary substance and universal as secondary substance; in so doing Aristotle emphasizes the universal to be subordinate to the individual in contrast to Hegel.

↓

Hegel prioritizes the universal over the individual, viewing them as _____(A)_____in terms of reason but differentiated through actions, while Aristotle emphasizes the individual as primary and the universal as secondary, _____(B)______the universal under the individual.           (A)                                     (B) ① unique                               dismissing ② undistinguished                placing  ③ general                              ignoring ④ monotonous                     putting ⑤ marked                              stressing

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

② undistinguished                placing 

 

Hegel prioritizes the universal over the individual, viewing them as undistinguished in terms of reason but differentiated through actions, while Aristotle emphasizes the individual as primary and the universal as secondary, placing the universal under the individual. 

헤겔은 보편을 개인보다 우선시하여 이성적으로는 구별되지 않으나 행동으로 구별된다고 보았고, 아리스토텔레스는 개인을 일차로, 보편을 이차로 강조하여 보편을 개인 아래에 두었다. 

 

참고 :

 

① unique 독특한                              dismissing 무시하면서
③ general  일반적인                         ignoring 무시하면서
④ monotonous  단조로운                putting 두면서
⑤ marked  특징적인                         stressing 강조하면서

 

 

잘했어요!

 

 

 

지금까지 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박쌤의

2023년 5월 고3 모의고사 34번 해설 및 변형문제를 연습하셨습니다.

 

다음 자료인  2023년 5월 고3 모의고사 35번 해설 및 변형문제도 확인해보실까요?

 

35번으로 가기

2023년 5월 고3 모의고사 35번 해설, 어휘 정리, 변형문제

 

이 외에도

구글, 다음, 네이버, 유튜브에서 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박쌤이라고 검색하시면

정말 많은 모의고사 변형문제 자료들을 무료로 활용하실 수 있습니다.

 

 

감사합니다.

5월모의고사변형문제