2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(39번) [모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어]

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(39번)와 정답자료가 필요하시다고요?

 

걱정 마세요! 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어가 해결해 드립니다!

 

 

 

 

3등급도 전교 1등으로! (서울  영일고, 송도 박문여고)

3등급도 전교 2등으로! (서울  목동고)

5등급도 1등급으로! (서울  진명여고)

3등급도 1등급으로! (서울 마포고, 서울 신도림고)

 

모두가 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어와 함께 한 결과입니다.

 

 

 

 

 

목동 현대파리지앙 409호 미키박영어 (010 6693 6636)

 

 

오늘은 2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(39번)와 정답자료를 제공해 드립니다.

 

 

 

모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어

 

좋은 내신 성적은 진심에서 나오는 거 아시죠?

 

39번 지문에 대한 완벽한 이해는 기본이죠?

 

 

미키박영어 2025년3월고2모의고사39번해설

 

 

39번 내용 확실히 익히셨으리라 믿고,

 

변형문제 도전 시작합니다!

 

 

 

 

Here we go!

 

 

 

 

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(39번) 

1. 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 어법상 틀린 것은?

 

As a general rule, it’s better if your definition corresponds as ①closely as possible to the way in which the term is ordinarily used in the kinds of debates to which your claims are pertinent. There will be, however, occasions where it is appropriate, even necessary, to coin special uses through ②what philosophers call stimulative definition. This would be the case ③where the current lexicon is not able to make distinctions that you think are philosophically important. For example, we do not have a term in ordinary language that describes a memory that is not necessarily a memory of something the person having it ④to have experienced. Such a thing would occur, for example, if I could somehow share your memories: I would have a memory­type experience, but this would not be of something that I had actually experienced. To call this a memory would be ⑤misleading. For this reason, philosophers have coined the special term ‘quasi­memory’ to refer to these hypothetical memory­like experiences.  

 

 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

④to have -> has

앞의 something the person 이 이상하죠?

명사 + 명사이니 말이죠. 

네, 바로 목적격관계대명사 that 이 something 뒤에 생략되었죠?

something that the person ~ 이렇게 말이죠.

그럼 the person 이 주어죠? 그럼, 주어 뒤에는 동사가 있어야죠? 그게 바로 ④번의 자리입니다.

따라서, ④번의 자리는 동사자리인 has 의 형태가 옳습니다.

to have 는 동사가 아닌 준동사죠?

 

준동사

 

 

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(39번) 

2 다음 밑줄 친 부분 중 문맥상 어색한 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

As a general rule, it’s better if your definition corresponds as closely as possible to the way in which the term is ordinarily used in the kinds of debates to which your claims are pertinent. There will be, however, occasions where it is appropriate, even necessary, to coin ① specific uses through what philosophers call stimulative definition. This would be the case where the current lexicon is not able to make ② connections that you think are philosophically important. For example, we do not have a term in ③ common language that describes a memory that is not necessarily a memory of something the person having it has experienced. Such a thing would occur, for example, if I could somehow share your memories: I would have a memory-type experience, but this would not be of something that I had actually experienced. To call this a memory would be ④ inaccurate. For this reason, philosophers have coined the special term ‘quasi-memory’ to refer to these ⑤ theoretical memory-like experiences. 

 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

정답
✅ ② connections → distinctions

해설 
2번 connections(연결, 관련성)은 문맥상 어색한 표현입니다.
원문에서는 "distinctions"(구별, 차이점)이라는 단어가 사용되었습니다.

→ 이 문장은 기존의 언어로는 구분할 수 없는 중요한 개념상의 차이를 설명할 수 없기 때문에 새로운 용어를 정의하는 것이 필요하다는 의미입니다.
→ 따라서 이 자리에 들어가야 할 적절한 단어는 **"distinctions"**이며, **"connections"**는 그 반대로 ‘연결’이나 ‘유사성’에 초점을 두기 때문에 부적절합니다.

다른 보기의 원문 단어
✔ ① specific (원문: special)
→ Special은 ‘특수한, 특별한’, specific도 ‘구체적인, 특정한’ 의미로 자연스럽게 대체됩니다.

✔ ③ common (원문: ordinary)
→ Ordinary는 ‘일상적인, 보통의’, common도 비슷한 의미로 문맥상 적절합니다.

✔ ④ inaccurate (원문: misleading)
→ Misleading은 ‘오해의 소지가 있는’, inaccurate는 ‘부정확한’으로, 문맥상 비슷한 뜻을 전달합니다.

✔ ⑤ theoretical (원문: hypothetical)
→ Hypothetical은 ‘가설적인’, theoretical은 ‘이론적인’으로, 실제가 아닌 추론적 상황을 말할 때 적절한 동의어입니다.

 

 

 

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(39번) 

3. 다음 문장에 이어질 글의 순서를 정하시오.

 

As a general rule, it’s better if your definition corresponds as closely as possible to the way in which the term is ordinarily used in the kinds of debates to which your claims are pertinent.

(A) To call this a memory would be misleading. For this reason, philosophers have coined the special term ‘quasi­memory’ to refer to these hypothetical memory­like experiences. 
(B) There will be, however, occasions where it is appropriate, even necessary, to coin special uses through what philosophers call stimulative definition. This would be the case where the current lexicon is not able to make distinctions that you think are philosophically important. 
(C) For example, we do not have a term in ordinary language that describes a memory that is not necessarily a memory of something the person having it has experienced. Such a thing would occur, for example, if I could somehow share your memories: I would have a memory­type experience, but this would not be of something that I had actually experienced. 
① (A) - (C) - (B)
② (B) - (A) - (C)
③ (B) - (C) - (A)
④ (C) - (B) - (A)
⑤ (C) - (A) - (B)

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답:
③ (B) - (C) - (A)

✅ 정답에 대한 이유:
**(B)**는 철학에서의 자극적 정의에 대해 설명하며, 특별한 정의가 필요한 상황을 다룹니다.

**(C)**는 일상 언어에서는 설명할 수 없는 개념을 예시로 들어 설명, 그 예시로 ‘quasi-memory’와 같은 새로운 개념이 필요한 이유를 설명합니다.

**(A)**는 새로운 개념을 정의하는 과정을 다루며, ‘quasi-memory’라는 특별한 용어의 필요성을 강조합니다.

따라서 전개 순서는 **(B) → (C) → (A)**가 가장 자연스럽고 논리적입니다.

✅ 한국어 해석:
일반적으로, 정의가 귀하의 주장이 적절한 논의에서 사용되는 방식에 가능한 한 가깝게 일치하는 것이 더 좋습니다.

(B) 하지만, 그럼에도 불구하고, 특별한 용어를 만들어내는 것이 적절하고 심지어 필요한 경우도 있습니다. 이런 경우는 현재의 어휘가 철학적으로 중요한 차이를 구별할 수 없을 때 발생합니다.
(C) 예를 들어, 우리는 사람이 경험한 것이 아닐 수도 있는 기억을 설명할 수 있는 일반적인 언어 용어를 가지고 있지 않습니다. 예를 들어, 내가 당신의 기억을 공유할 수 있다면, 나는 기억과 유사한 경험을 하게 되지만, 이것은 내가 실제로 경험한 것이 아닙니다.
(A) 이를 기억이라고 부르는 것은 오해를 불러일으킬 수 있습니다. 이러한 이유로 철학자들은 이러한 가상의 기억 같은 경험을 설명하기 위해 ‘quasi-memory’라는 특별한 용어를 만들어 냈습니다.

 

 

 

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(39번) 

 

4. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 가장 알맞은 것은? (원문 일부 변형 문제입니다.)

 

As a general rule, it’s better if your definition corresponds as closely as possible to the way in which the term is ordinarily used in the kinds of debates to which your claims are pertinent. There will be, however, occasions where it is appropriate, even necessary, to coin special uses through what philosophers call stimulative definition. This would be the case where the current lexicon is not able to make distinctions that you think are philosophically important. For example, we do not have a term in ordinary language that describes a memory that is not necessarily a memory of something the person having it has experienced. Such a thing would occur, for example, if I could somehow share your memories: I would have a memory­type experience, but this would not be of something that I had actually experienced. To call this a memory would be misleading. For this reason, philosophers have coined the special term ‘quasi­memory’ to refer to these hypothetical memory­like experiences. __________. 
① The term ‘quasi-memory’ is widely used in everyday language to describe hypothetical memory-like experiences. 
② Stimulative definitions should only be used when a term is too broadly defined to fit any particular use.
③ The definition of memory has not changed significantly over the years despite philosophical challenges.
④ Ordinary language cannot fully explain philosophical concepts and definitions are rarely needed.
⑤ Philosophers coined the term ‘quasi-memory’ to describe a memory-like experience that is not based on personal experience. 

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

정답
⑤ Philosophers coined the term ‘quasi-memory’ to describe a memory-like experience that is not based on personal experience.

풀이
⑤ 철학자들이 '준기억(quasi-memory)'이라는 용어를 만들어냈는데, 이는 개인적 경험에 근거하지 않은 기억과 유사한 경험을 설명하기 위함이다 → 지문에서 'quasi-memory'라는 용어는 개인적으로 경험하지 않은 기억과 유사한 경험을 설명하기 위해 만들어졌다고 명시되고 있기 때문에 정답입니다.
① 'quasi-memory'라는 용어는 일상 언어에서 널리 사용된다 → 지문에서는 'quasi-memory'가 철학적 개념으로 만들어졌다는 설명이므로 틀립니다.
② 자극적 정의는 용어가 너무 일반적으로 정의되어 있을 때만 사용해야 한다 → 지문에서는 '자극적 정의'가 철학적으로 중요한 구별을 만들기 위해 사용될 수 있다고 설명되므로 틀립니다.
③ 기억의 정의는 철학적 도전에도 불구하고 크게 변하지 않았다 → 지문에서는 기억의 정의가 변화한 이유를 설명하고 있기 때문에 틀립니다.
④ 일상 언어는 철학적 개념을 완전히 설명할 수 없고, 정의는 거의 필요하지 않다 → 지문에서 철학적 용어가 필요함을 설명하고 있으므로 틀립니다.

해석
일반적으로, 당신의 정의가 당신의 주장과 관련된 논쟁에서 사용되는 용어의 일반적인 용법과 가능한 한 밀접하게 일치하는 것이 더 좋습니다. 그러나 때때로 특별한 용어 사용을 만들 필요가 있을 때가 있는데, 이것을 철학자들이 **자극적 정의(stimulatory definition)**라고 부릅니다. 이것은 현재의 언어집합이 철학적으로 중요한 구별을 만드는 데 부족할 때 필요한 경우입니다. 예를 들어, 우리는 어떤 사람이 경험하지 않은 것에 대한 기억을 설명하는 일상 언어 용어가 없습니다. 예를 들어, 내가 당신의 기억을 공유할 수 있다면, 나는 기억 같은 경험을 가질 수 있지만, 실제로 내가 경험한 것은 아닙니다. 이것을 기억이라고 부르는 것은 잘못된 표현입니다. 이러한 이유로 철학자들은 이러한 가상의 기억 유사 경험을 설명하기 위해 '준기억(quasi-memory)'이라는 특별한 용어를 만들어냈습니다. 따라서 '준기억'은 개인적인 경험에 근거하지 않은 기억과 유사한 경험을 설명하기 위해 철학자들에 의해 만들어졌습니다.

어휘 정리
definition 정의
conjecture 추측, 가설
experience 경험
misleading 오해를 일으키는
hypothetical 가상의
stimulative 자극적인
philosophy 철학
memory 기억
lexicon 어휘
perception 인식

 

 

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(39번) 

5. 다음 글의 내용을 한 문장으로 요약하고자 한다. 빈칸 (A), (B)에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

 

As a general rule, it’s better if your definition corresponds as closely as possible to the way in which the term is ordinarily used in the kinds of debates to which your claims are pertinent. There will be, however, occasions where it is appropriate, even necessary, to coin special uses through what philosophers call stimulative definition. This would be the case where the current lexicon is not able to make distinctions that you think are philosophically important. For example, we do not have a term in ordinary language that describes a memory that is not necessarily a memory of something the person having it has experienced. Such a thing would occur, for example, if I could somehow share your memories: I would have a memory-type experience, but this would not be of something that I had actually experienced. To call this a memory would be misleading. For this reason, philosophers have coined the special term ‘quasi-memory’ to refer to these hypothetical memory-like experiences. 

↓

Philosophers may use (A)___________ definitions to clarify concepts when ordinary language lacks (B)__________.
       (A)                     (B)
① formal                  logic
② standard               consistency
③ lexical                  nuance
④ stipulative            precision
⑤ contextual            clarity

정답은?

 

 

 

 

 

✅ 정답: ④ stipulative ··· precision

✨ 해설:
(A) stipulative (정의적, 특수한 목적을 위한)
→ 지문 중 “through what philosophers call stimulative [stipulative] definition” 이라는 직접적인 언급이 있으며, 이는 기존 단어로 설명이 어려운 개념을 새롭게 정의하는 방식을 의미합니다.

(B) precision (정확성)
→ “where the current lexicon is not able to make distinctions…” 즉, 정확한 구분(precision)이 부족한 경우 새로운 용어를 만들어야 한다는 맥락입니다.

📌 오답 해설

① formal / logic: 형식과 논리는 본문의 초점이 아님

② standard / consistency: 일반적 정의나 일관성보다 새로운 개념 정립이 핵심

③ lexical / nuance: ‘lexical definition’은 사전에 있는 의미이며, 여기서는 그것을 넘는 경우를 설명함

⑤ contextual / clarity: 문맥과 명료성도 부분적으로 관련 있지만 핵심어는 아님

 

 

 

 

 

지금까지 모의고사변형문제월드 목동 미키박영어의

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(39번)와 정답자료였습니다.

 

2025년3월고2모의고사변형문제(40번)와 정답자료도 확인해보실까요?

 

 

 

이 외에도

구글, 다음, 네이버, 유튜브에서 모의고사변형문제월드 미키박영어라고 검색하시면

정말 많은 모의고사 변형문제 자료들을 무료로 활용하실 수 있습니다.

 

 

그리고, 영문법에 대한 유용한 자료는

재미짐영어 미키박쌤을 확인해보세요.

 

감사합니다.